Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Main Menu
Accueil - Home
Articles
DX cluster
Photo Gallery
Forum
Liens - Links
Contactez-nous - Contact us


VE2SB
We have 308 guests online




Accueil - Home arrow Forum
Contest Group du Quebec  


ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/07 17:43
                ARRL160 Summary Sheet

      Start Date : 2014-12-05

   CallSign Used : VE2FXL
     Operator(s) : VE2FXL

Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
Assisted Category : NON-ASSISTED
            Band : 160M
           Power : LOW
            Mode : CW
Default Exchange : QC
      Gridsquare : FN46PC

            Name : Luc Fontaine
    ARRL Section : QC
       Club/Team : Contest group du Quebec
        Software : N1MM Logger+ 1.0.4372.0

       Band     QSOs     Pts  Sec
        1.8      45      90   30
      Total      45      90   30


           Score : 2 700

Total Time On 03:13  (193 mins)

73
et bonne semaine à tous
Luc
VE2FXL
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/07 18:33 ARRL160 Summary Sheet
      Start Date : 2014-12-05
   CallSign Used : VE2FK
Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
Assisted Category : ASSISTED
            Band : 160M
           Power : LOW
            Mode : CW
Default Exchange : QC
       Club/Team : Contest Group du Quebec
        Software : N1MM Logger+ 1.0.4372.0

Total Time on :  3.36H

       Band     QSOs     Pts  Sec
        1,8     119     238   34
      Total     119     238   34

Score : 8 092
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/07 18:48 Call: VA2EW
Operator(s): VA2EW
Station: VA2EW

Class: Single Op HP
QTH: Montreal QC
Operating Time (hrs): 31

Summary:
Total:  QSOs = 1389  Sections = 80  Countries = 28  Total Score = 329,832

Club: Contest Group du Quebec

Comments:

Is the 1830-35 intercontinental window rule still up to date?
Taking into account the few DX's in this window and in this contest in general
we can understand the temptation of some to run in it.
But it is still written in the official rules and those breaking it are taking
an obvious advantage on others then I see that as a form of cheating.
On the other hand this window could be narrowed to 2khz or so by an update of
the rules.
In any case I did not heard about any action from ARRL about the respect of
this rule so perhaps the ones violating it are right to do so.

On my side this year my lowest ever DX mult number and a low number of qso with
Europe perhaps this noise in West direction destroying rx on W beverage and
having an influence by 6-10dB on noise on N-E too is responsible when Eu sigs
are at the low level of this WE. After the contest I have seen that I have been
spotted by several EU that I was not able to hear. Sorry for that guys, you
should listen from here to understand!!!
Strangely, of the whole WE the EU signals were at their best during the K=5
period.

I do not see how this line noise can change before the coming CQWW 160.
Hydro already came two times on that and I am starting to lose hope.
Actually even if Hydro fixes this problem, another one could start at any
time.
The lines are close to 50 years old and everything has to be changed.
Not mentioning the frequent tree falls that are creating future failures after
too fast repairing in the hurry of after tempest situation.

Another score improvement source linked to local noise should be to have the
possibility to listen on the vertical antenna for common traffic and to use the
bev only on difficult cases.
It is not my case and 80% of the time I have to ask for a repeat the time to
find the right direction of the signal which is not helped by the FCC give up
of USA area numbers in callsigns.
The good thing is that it shows that my beverages even if short have a very
good directivity, the bad side is that a big amount of time is wasted and then
qso's.

Always the same dilema : to increase my score I should have to take a decision
about a remote contest site.

I use to think that this contest could last only 24 hours, because if the first
night is fun it is less the case of the other one with its 20q/h and its DUPE
festival. But this time, as the propagation was bad the former night, the
missing contacts were done the second night giving a little more activity and
interest.

The trick is to find other activities like preparing this text in parallel of
pushing the F1 key.

73's, thanks for the calls and for your patience

Gilles VA2EW / VE2TZT
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/07 21:47 Really nice score Gilles!

Luc
VE2FXL
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/07 23:04 Beau score Gilles

Pas un remote contest site mais un remote RX site avec un accès Internet !

73 Dany VE2EBK
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/07 23:13 My results:

     Operator(s) : VA2WA

Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
           Power : HIGH

       Band    QSOs    Pts  Sec  DXCC
        1.8     306     615   48     1

           Score : 30,135
Total Time On 04:06  (246 mins)



I'm not able to afford a second major contest in just one week after CQ WW. Usually it takes almost whole week for rehabilitation after 48 hours contest. Also I've known this weekend top band propagation will be bad due to M-class flare. So I made just few QSOs from home by using my modest antenna.

Gilles, nice score anyway)) Was nice to work other CGQ guys, VE2FK, VA2AM and VA2EW.

The next contest I'd like to do my best would be CQ WW 160 CW in January. I like it much more compare to ARRL 160 which is usually bit boring for me ))

73!

Victor

VA2WA / VA2WDQ

Post edited by: va2wdq, at: 2014/12/07 23:16
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/08 10:25 Even from Home you have a nice signal Victor. I was using my 80/40m dipole, LP and could
even hear some DX. I will try to get an antenna for the next contest, I love that band.
73, Claude VE2FK
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/09 20:12 I could not afford much time for this contest, Friday night was terrible with light snow shower and seen I am leaving about 1 km and 3 km from 360kv and 735kv lines this increases my noise floor by 30 db on K9Ay rx antenna! I just spent 2 hours on Saturday late evening on my second day with better result but we cannot expect great dx opening with fair band conditions from high D layer level. The strongest DX was M5M what a big signal...+S-9 with a total of 12 dx countries.

The dx window isn't respected anymore and this will be similar with cqwwcw160.
With SDR and remote station, we cannot know anymore if the TX and RX are located inside the 1500' as per the rule.
K3LR used 8x SDR, 8x computers, UPS, PS with separate rx antenna linked to cw skimmer as multiplier support for the their SO2R with a second operator in MM class.

VA2AM
SOHP (A)

QSO     Pt     Sec
125     280     56

Total: 15,680
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:ARRL 160 CW 2014 - 2014/12/16 20:53 Un peu tard pour inscrire mon résultat en cette période occupée....avec sortie en soirée.

 Operator(s) : VA2AM

Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
Assisted Category : ASSISTED
            Band : ALL
           Power : HIGH
            Mode : CW
Default Exchange : QC
ARRL Section : QC
       Club/Team : Contest Group du Quebec
        Software : N1MM Logger+ 0.19.4310.0

       Band     QSOs     Pts  Sec
        1.8        125     280   56
      Total       125     280   56

           Score : 15,680
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.



Powered by Online-Montreal